Skip to content
BasketBlade

HUB 03 · Personal Blenders

Ninja Blast BC151 Review

A documentation-based review of Ninja's cordless portable. It is cheap, USB-C, and from a brand with a real service operation - and its own spec table lists the wattage as zero, which is a data-entry failure but an accidentally honest one.

By Stephen V.Updated How we pick
#ad

We earn a commission if you buy through our links. It does not change the price you pay, and it does not decide our picks — our selection criteria are published in full. How this works.

The short answer

Quick picks

#ProductBest forScorePrice
01
no image
Ninja Blast BC151

The cheapest way to blend away from a socket. Ninja's own spec table lists its wattage as zero, which is a data-entry failure but an accidentally honest one.

The cheapest portable
5.4
Check priceAmazon

#ad · Prices pulled live from the Amazon Product API, last checked Aug 7, 2026. Where we have no verified live price we show none — we would rather leave a gap than print a number that has gone stale. Scores are our own, compiled from published specs; they are not test results.

The Ninja Blast BC151 is the cheapest sensible way to blend away from a socket from a brand that has a real service operation behind it. It charges over USB-C, makes an 18 oz serving in the vessel you drink from, and carries a one-year warranty. The oddity: Ninja’s own specification table lists its wattage as 0 W and its peak wattage as 0 W — a data-entry failure that is, accidentally, the most honest thing on the page, because there is no meaningful mains-comparable power figure for a small battery blender.

What this review is.Specification-based, not hands-on — this site owns no blenders. Every figure is from SharkNinja’s own BC151 specification table. Where the spec sheet gives no usable number, this page says so. Our method is published in full.

The zero-watt spec sheet

Read SharkNinja’s specification table for the Blast and the power fields read 0 W and 0 W peak. It is plainly a data-entry error — the machine obviously drawssomething— but the effect is that no usable wattage is published for it at all, and the only power-related figure Ninja gives is a 7.4 V USB-C rechargeable base. Since there is no published wattage, there is no running-cost figure, and we will not manufacture one from a battery voltage. For a portable, wattage was never the point anyway; battery life and capacity are.

What it is genuinely good at

Three real strengths. It is among the cheapest cordless blenders you can buy from a brand with actual service behind it, rather than a no-name. It uses USB-C rather than a proprietary charger. And 18 oz is a sensible single serving in a vessel that doubles as the drinking cup — the whole point of a portable. Ninja’s blade geometry also handles soft frozen fruit better than the price suggests, within the limits of any battery machine.

The limits

The 7.4 V base is half the voltage of the Beast GO’s 11.1 V battery, and battery blenders are already the least powerful category here — so this is firmly a soft-load machine: powder, soft fruit, liquid, maybe a little soft frozen fruit with room to move. The warranty is one year, shorter than Beast’s two on a comparable portable, and no power figure is published to compare it on. If you want the better-documented, longer-warranted cordless, that is the Beast GO; if you want the cheapest from a real brand, this is it.

Who it is for

Buy it if you want an inexpensive, brand-backed portable for soft shakes on the move and USB-C is a must. Skip it if you want to compare it on power (there is no number), need to blend anything hard-frozen, or value a two-year warranty over one — the Beast GO is the step up, and the portable roundup ranks them together.

In detail

The full spec

01

The cheapest portable

Ninja Blast BC151

USB-C chargingWattage listed as zero
5.4/10

The cheapest way to blend away from a socket. Ninja's own spec table lists its wattage as zero, which is a data-entry failure but an accidentally honest one.

Warranty
3.5
Portability
9
Frozen
3.5
Documentation
2.5
Value
8.5

What it gets right

  • Among the cheapest cordless blenders from a brand with a real service operation behind it
  • USB-C rather than a proprietary charger
  • 18 oz is a sensible single serving and the vessel is the drinking cup
  • Ninja's blade geometry handles soft frozen fruit better than the price suggests

What it doesn't

  • SharkNinja's own specification table lists the wattage as 0 watts and the peak wattage as 0 watts — no usable power figure is published for this machine at all
  • One-year warranty
  • 7.4 V is half the voltage of the Beast GO's battery, and battery blenders are already the least powerful category here

What it costs to run

Ninja publishes no usable wattage for this machine, so we do not show a running-cost figure for it. Here is the method we would have used.

Skip this if…

you want to compare it on power — Ninja publishes no meaningful wattage for it, so any power claim you read about this machine came from somewhere other than the manufacturer.

Check price on Amazon →

We don't have a verified live price right now, so we aren't showing one.

#ad · we may earn a commission from this link to Ninja Blast BC151

A cheap portable from a brand with real service

The reason to pay a little for a Ninja Blast over an anonymous portable is not the specs — it is that SharkNinja runs an actual service and returns operation, so a machine that fails in the first year is a support ticket rather than a dead end. USB-C charging is the other quiet win: no proprietary brick to lose. Treat the 18 oz vessel as one drink, and the drinking lid as the whole point of owning it.

The honest limits, and the step up

Ninja publishes no usable wattage — the spec table literally reads zero — and the 7.4 V base is half the voltage of the Beast GO’s battery, so this sits at the gentle end of an already-gentle category. Soft fruit, powder, liquid, and a little soft frozen fruit with room to move are its comfort zone; a packed cup of hard frozen fruit is not.

If you want a longer warranty and published cycles-per-charge, the Beast GO is the upgrade for more money. If you want the cheapest brand-backed way to blend a shake away from a socket, the Blast is exactly that — provided you keep your expectations to soft loads. Both are ranked in the portable roundup.

How we picked

Blenders we claim to have tested: 0

Every site in this category tells you they blended twenty smoothies. We have not blended any, and we say so. Here is what we do instead: read the manufacturer's manual and spec sheet, record the published motor rating, jar capacity and warranty term, verify the warranty against the manufacturer's own warranty document, work out what the machine costs to run for a year and show the arithmetic, and cite all of it so you can check the work. Prices come live from Amazon's API and disappear rather than go stale.

The scores above are judgments from that documented research — not test results. The full rubric, including what disqualifies a product, is published in full.

Questions

Frequently asked

How many watts is the Ninja Blast?

Ninja’s own specification table lists it as 0 W and 0 W peak — clearly a data-entry error, but the result is that no usable wattage is published for it. The only power figure given is a 7.4 V USB-C rechargeable base.

Can the Ninja Blast crush ice or blend frozen fruit?

It handles soft frozen fruit with some liquid better than its price suggests, but it is a battery blender at half the voltage of the Beast GO — hard-frozen loads and ice are outside its lane. Treat it as a soft-load portable.

Ninja Blast or Beast GO?

The Blast is cheaper; the Beast GO has a two-year warranty (against one), a higher-voltage battery, and published cycles-per-charge. Price against documentation and warranty — see the portable roundup.

Keep reading

Receipts

Sources

We do not run a testing lab and we do not pretend to. Specifications come from the manufacturer's own published documents and from published standards; prices come from the live Amazon API. Where a figure is not published, the page says “not published” rather than guessing. Read the full method.